You used to do this in the old council forums. It's alot of effort, its pretty cool when you get done, I would click on it and maybe read alot of it, probably more like some of it. And it would be totally ignored by the greens even though they would post things like "this is interesting, I'm saving this". Then months later you would find game aspects and interactions that are directly contrary to your results, and rage/reference the analysis. At least that's how it's gone every time before this. But the most common mistakes I see and the part of the game that took me the longest to grasp was how deck building plays into deploy strategy which plays into "playing the long game".
board control definitely a problem especially on unbalanced maps like st and sp maps and groves of ashes
Sound so smart "Pox Analysis team" Must be some high grade people there , could you name some so i can be in awe of there magnificence's .
nope. poll asks what subject i wanted analysis on by the 'pox team'. I wanted to hear the analysis of the 'pox team' on Hearthstone. totally legit. and if taken seriously could enhance the discussion of other pox topics.
I wouldn't say you aren't qualified. no one is asking you to parse out the HS meta. though I bet a few of you could. its like this..... newer players are probably going to be familiar with HS already. but if they bring that mentality to pox (like deck building for example) they could run into early frustration. when I say 'analyze Hearthstone' I mean in relation to pox. that wasn't clear?
Did someone say creme da la creme? On Topic: I voted matchups, but it is way behind. All the topics are good, so aint no losers in this thread.