IS also has a ton of Equipment Boon. Not sure why they didnt just use that instead of making a new Surge ability anyway.
Well by now the Greens know their player base is mostly dbags who would rather complain and argue than show gratitude, so I won't bother apologizing on behalf of that player base. Instead I will say: these runes look super interesting, and I can't wait to buy some runes Tuesday.
Show gratitude? What the Firk for? This isn't a sighting of messiah, we just want them to sell their product. And from the looks of it that product may not be what some of us want. If this upsets you, maybe you should realise that ronin is buisiness, not charity.
To be clear, there have been some unnecessary complaints. But not everyone is going to love every rune that's released, even if they are very well designed. Keep in mind, part of this thread (including my posts) has been about past runes which haven't been changed. Regarding those runes, there is nothing to be grateful about.
Also realize that we've made it clear to developers we love new content. So I wouldn't be discouraged or fearful regarding that.
...I didn't paint those. I'm the "Faxtar" who painted the Silverclan Hoplite, and my user name is "Faxtar" but I didn't paint those. Is someone pretending to be me?
Hmmm interesting. The likely answer is that those are just example previews and that the artist name is just part of a template but since the first of the three is a different name that may not be the case.
Some of these if they are attributed to the wrong artist there is no record from the previous owner of Pox to indicate who the original artist was. This is where the community can help clear some of these up. @Faxtar , includeing Twisted Fireoak what rune art are you attributed to that you did not make?
I didn't do Lonx Missionary either. Silverclan Hoplite is the only card I did paint, so any other card with my name on it is incorrect. While you're at it you could change my accreditation on Silverclan Hoplite to "Matthew 'Faxtar' Starbuck" Thanks!