Nohkan Disciples "Jakei pupils are trained together so that on the battlefield they may maintain there brotherly bonds" Artwork: Jakei standing crouched back to back with another surrounded by broken bones Faction: ST Race: Jakei Class: Warrior Nora: 74 Rarity: UnCommon DMG 7 SPD 6 RNG 1 DEF 1 HP 44 Attack: Physical Arctic Sibling Sibling Rivalry (When this champion destroys an opposing champions all other friendly champions with the same name as this one gain +1 damage permanently) Nohkan Do Upgrade Path 1 Sundering Discipline Freezing Discipline Crippling Discipline Upgrade Path 2 Reflexes - 1 Evasive - 1
Not sure if Sibling Rivalry is needed. I'd rather see it changed to "If you have another Jakei Brothers in play, this champion gains Flanking" to make it a positive ability. The flavortext sounds like Protective should be added. (To upgrades?)
the affects of sibling boost this champion pretty good so It did require a setback of some type although its not a big one its appropriate for a champ with relatively low nora cost for a jakei I added protective instead of damage 2 in upgraded abilities
With Sibling, their stats are DMG 15 SPD 6 RNG 1 DEF 2 HP 49 (+5 or +10 with faction bonus) Damage wise, they become very efficient while the other stats are all pretty decent as long as Sibling is activated. Nohkan Do makes them survive longer, so the Sibling buff will last longer. Sibling's already have a setback in itself, that their stats are pretty bad once one is dead and that you have to invest a lot of mana in them to grant them their buff, so I don't think they need a setback ability. What about having Sibling Riverly being "Whenever this champion destroys a champion, all other Jakei Brothers Gain a rank of Multi Attack and gain 1 Extra damage." When one of the siblings starts doing better than the other, the other feels like it have to try harder. Would also make it so once one is defeated, the other one is not fully weakened.
great ideas when I first thought of the ability i thought of sibling rivalry taking that path but I thought it would be to op i'll take your advice, thanks.
