Terrorist Attacks in Belgium: Europe United?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by DarkJello, Mar 18, 2016.

  1. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    I hope that is the goal of you and your people. So far the action taken and statements by your leaders point very solidly in that direction.

    IMO, it is equally dangerous to underestimate or overestimate the degree of threat these terrorists pose. If you will recall, I voiced my DISagreement with Trump's proposed temporary Muslim ban many times. (Repeating, cause I am sure some here have forgotten that is my position). I see where he is coming from, but I just cannot get myself to agree. Notice I am NOT being irrational like so many Trump haters, and claiming the suggested temporary Muslim ban is somehow similar to FDR--a Democrat--rounding up American citizens that happened to be of Japanese descent and chucking them into large jails. I firmly believe a ban is NOT the proper policy, even though it is clearly legal.

    So I don't advocate overdoing it, but that is tough/impossible to guarantee when so many 100s of Belgiums just lost a loved one to terrorists that will NEVER choose to stop.
     
  2. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    Questions for belgian peeps;
    1:Ya'llright?
    2:Whats the dealio with sharia4belgium right now because those ****s sometimes spill over the border and clearly I am not confident in belgiums ability to stop terrorists.
    3: why is poepen in flemish a word for having sex instead of the obvious dutch word for going nr 2, totally miscomunication about intended use of toilet cubicle.

    also aditional info:
    Isis oficially claimed responsibility.
    the suspects:
    [​IMG]

    apparently police took suspects for the train station bombing alive already
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2016
    DarkJello likes this.
  3. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    we should focus on the positive... german ladies in uniforms that are not also nazis

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    they could be I guess I can't tell their politics
     
  4. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    No matter what their politics are, I still appreciate such cute lethality. Actual assault weapons means these gals are legit. I would comply with their orders.
     
  5. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    this just makes it sound like you thought european swat/military police were gunless like an english bobby walking a route trough a quiet neighborhood checking for windows left open a wee bit too far and warning people of the posibility of being burglarized.

    instead of you know... equiping cops for role and occasion...
    as opposed to using taxpayer money to buy an artillery piece to show how tough on crime you are as to get re-elected
    [​IMG]
    Remember, those mexican drug cartels are known to hide landmines on american soil. arizona police need landmine proof vehicles.
    [​IMG]
     
    Pattn199 and DarkJello like this.
  6. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    Geressen, give me some credit. Of course Europe has fantastic police and law enforcement. They get the job done, when needed. I said the gals were legit lethal.

    That tank is fraggin awesome!! My respect for his badassery just increased. Thanks for sharing.
     
    Geressen likes this.
  7. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    tank is cool, but the reason it exists isn't https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Arpaio

    but this is going off topic we need the belgians in here to tell us how they are and what is what.
     
  8. Sokolov

    Sokolov The One True Cactuar Octopi

    I don't think it's awesome. I think it's a waste of taxpayer dollars and is emblematic of the problem with the militarization of US police. They aren't the military and they shouldn't be buying tanks.
     
    Tweek516, SPiEkY and Geressen like this.
  9. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    Feeling the Bern again. Please don't tell my family. ;)


    March 22, 2016

    “We offer our deepest condolences to the families who lost loved ones in this barbaric attack and to the people of Brussels who were the target of another cowardly attempt to terrorize innocent civilians. We stand with our European allies to offer any necessary assistance in these difficult times.

    “Today’s attack is a brutal reminder that the international community must come together to destroy ISIS. This type of barbarism cannot be allowed to continue.”


    http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...anders-decries-barbarism-of-brussels-attacks/


    Notice he said "destroy", not contain. He gets it. Reality FTW.
     
    Pattn199 and Geressen like this.
  10. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    I've mentioned before that currently the problem is there is no endgoal/endgame in syria for the west. simpler for russia because obviously : "Kill everything opposite of our ally assad" is much simpler than "throw bombs only on religious fundamentalists and try and stay out of the other parts of the civil war with the dictator and hope things improve." now I wonder what Bernies plan for that near proxy war is but I havn't looked into it because I can't vote for US president anyway and I was busy looking into what I should vote on the advisory referendum on the association treaty between EU/NL and ukraine.

    I'm thinking of voting yes, sure it benefits the businessmen of both countries and doesn't really benefit the average joe of either country but it also messes with the relations between russia and EU and declines russias influence on ukraine while increasing EU influence. see I think we should oppose russia because they've been literally hitlering with their anschlussing

    that said the Ideals and positions bernie has espoused are I think the right choice for the american people and the world at large. sadly the american people seem to disagree, but there is always hope.
     
    DarkJello likes this.
  11. Sokolov

    Sokolov The One True Cactuar Octopi

    It's nice to say "destroy ISIS" without a real plan of how to do it, but realistically I don't see how you accomplish it without entrenching yourself in a multi-decade war during a time when many Americans want the US to be less involved in international affairs of that type. At the same time, terrorism is basically a hydra, you cut off ISIS' head and another one pops up.

    I think people and politicians who say "just destroy ISIS" or some such should really stop and think about what it means and how it can be accomplished. Because the reality is that it isn't so clear.
     
    Tweek516, BurnPyro and DarkJello like this.
  12. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    Big chunk of a Bloomberg View article follows:

    March 22, 2016

    Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders spoke to the Brussels Forum on Sunday morning and detailed the successful efforts to arrest Salah Abdeslam, believed to be one of the main plotters of the Paris attacks in November. He was captured in the Brussels neighborhood of Molenbeek.

    Abdeslam told Belgian authorities while in custody that “he was ready to restart something from Brussels,” Reynders said. Belgian intelligence determined that Abdeslam had built a new network of support in Brussels in the four months since the Paris attacks, expanding to include criminal networks that worked with the terrorists to share apartments and leverage connections to procure weapons.

    “There are many networks, not only members of his family,” Reynders said, adding that there more than 30 people had been involved in the terrorist attacks in Paris and “we are sure there are others.”

    The problem of foreign fighters leaving Europe for Syria and then returning to Europe to level attacks on civilians is not new. In May 2014, a French national returned from Syria to Europe, where he attacked the Jewish museum in Brussels. Intelligence sharing between the U.S., European countries, and countries in the region -- especially Turkey -- is key to combatting this threat, Reynders said. He added that cooperation was improving.


    http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-03-22/belgium-warned-of-attacks-it-wasn-t-enough

    (Emphasis mine).
     
  13. Geressen

    Geressen Forum Royalty

    the problem is you guys don't want to be entrenched in a civil war cluster**** in syria because that would mean backing up russias ally or going into a new cold war supporting the other non isis rebels in a proxy war against russias ally assad.

    it's currently a no win situation to act. while the fact is ISIS needs destruction you cannot do that with boots on the ground in syria without causing a major upset in global political dynamic.

    anyways russia isn't making itself popular either. so many sanctions going both ways between russia and the west and even turkey it's an economics trade war. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/07/russia-retaliates-western-sanctions-ban-food-imports
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2016
  14. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    Agreed because that is the reality of the situation.

    I believe the best goal is destruction. Advocating for containment implies that a tie is the best we can ever get. Maybe that is true, but we should try to win.
     
    Geressen likes this.
  15. Sokolov

    Sokolov The One True Cactuar Octopi

    I find it interesting that you harp on this word "containment" with Obama.

    Here are some other things Obama has said about ISIL (as he prefers to call them):

    "Obama said the U.S. and coalition partners had launched nearly 9,000 airstrikes since the campaign against ISIS began last year, noting the number of bombs dropped in November was higher than any previous month.

    "Every day, we destroy as well more of ISIL's forces -- their fighting positions, bunkers, and staging areas; their heavy weapons, bomb-making factories, compounds and training camps," Obama said. "In many places, ISIL has lost its freedom of maneuver because they know if they mass their forces, we will wipe them out."
    "

    "“As we squeeze its heart, we’ll make it harder for Isil to pump its terror and propaganda to the rest of the world,” the president said"

    "“So far Isil has lost about 40% of the populated areas it once controlled in Iraq, and it will lose more ... Isil’s lost thousands of square miles of territory it once controlled in Syria and it will lose more. The special forces that I ordered to Syria have begun supporting local forces as they push south, cut off supply lines and tighten the squeeze on Raqqa.”"

    As early as 2014, Obama has literally used the word destroy:

    "“Our objective is clear: We will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.”"

    Now, you can argue that it hasn't been done effectively, or whatever. But to take so much issue with the word "contain" or "containment" seems to be a double standard here when Trump gets so much leeway in what he says from you.

    We also note that the strategy of containment is, technically, one that can lead to destruction. In the case of ISIS/ISIL/whatever, the idea is that creating a scenario where internal pressures collapses the group from within (rather than to put large amounts of boots on the ground in an invasion-style strategy).

    Is it working? Depends on who you ask, but it's disingenuous to suggest the goal cannot be destruction.

    To put it another way: Destruction is the stated goal, containment is the strategy. You can argue and discuss whether containment is not the best strategy to achieve that goal, but you can't say that destruction is not the goal just because the strategy is containment.

    That said, right wing media has certainly managed to convince a lot of people that Obama doesn't want to destroy ISIS when Obama's own words suggest otherwise.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2016
    Geressen and BurnPyro like this.
  16. DarkJello

    DarkJello I need me some PIE!

    TONS of great quotes. Appreciate the solid share. American forces have killed 1 million peeps during Obama's tenure. He has bragged at being such a good killer. Curious choice of words for a guy that "won" a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. (What a firking joke of an award that year)!

    ISIL is not yet destroyed. We have made progress during the last 7 years. Maybe the next POTUS will finish the job, if that is even possible.

    Obama is all for mass migration of "refugees", and ISIL has and continues to use that policy to terrorize wherever they desire. Are we at war or not?? Obama is trying to have it both ways, and that will never work. I believe this is war, and in war you CANNOT advocate for 100s of thousands of warrior-aged men from the countries you are bombing back to the stone age to freely enter your nation. Madness, and not in the MTG way. We should help them over there, instead of importing more terrorists.

    I still don't believe we should ban all Muslims. But the disconnect between bombing and mass immigration is counter intuitive. to say the least.
     
  17. BurnPyro

    BurnPyro Forum Royalty

    Arpaio is a despicable human being



    Anyhow, on the belgium stuff. From what I can gather agencies were tracking them, but couldn't prevent the bombs. Estimates of about 150 people with a flag on that we should be tracking. Poor works of some agencies coming to light now, as bad as tragedies are, they have a way of sharpening and streamlining agencies responsible. Let's hope that's a positive from all of this.
     
  18. newsbuff

    newsbuff Forum Royalty

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1033_program
    Most of it is free surplus military equipment due to wars winding down. The program was created because the police departments couldn't afford to arm themselves to compete with drug cartels.

    And yes, it's friggin cool as hell.
     
    DarkJello likes this.
  19. newsbuff

    newsbuff Forum Royalty

    Also, spoke with PoxPoints, who lives in Ghent (35 min. from Brussles) and he is fine.
     
    Pattn199, darklord48, SPiEkY and 2 others like this.
  20. Sokolov

    Sokolov The One True Cactuar Octopi

    This is a big topic, but a few notes:
    • opportunity cost is still a cost
    • the program itself has overhead costs
    • these surplus equipment are still clearly functional (but we have to feed the military industrial complex!)
    • there appears to be valid criticism of the program and whether the areas receiving these machines really need them
      • in one case, a sheriff of a small town of 500 acquired bayonets, which were never opened, clearly a waste of money even if it's just shipping
      • Police Chief said: "That was one of those things in the old days you got it because you thought it was cool…then, after you get it, you’re like, ‘What the hell am I going to do with this?"
    • cost of shipping these things aren't cheap, especially if they were previously deployed overseas
    • in other cases, such things are auctioned off to other countries, providing a source of revenue
      • arguable whether weapon sales is a good idea, but the US does it often either way
     

Share This Page