well europe has never had free speech. not in the way america does in their constitution i mean not really. but it's a shame to see what little they did have die. don't worry though this train doesn't stop until it starts to effect the rich, then you'll see it come to a stop real fast.
that's the UK, they are ... special... I oncy accidentally brought a knife into the UK, then they didn't let me take it out of the UK. they probably gave it to some chav prick.
Doesn't even seem to be in that bad of taste. He's not supporting ****'s or promoting them or anything, in the video in question he saying they are the worst
the swedish political correctness thread is the other one. also where do you find these absolutely unreliable and unlikeable people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Joseph_Watson ah okay got it, infowars. hes against the friggin frogs turning gay then.
sure theres a connection but Swedes are nuts for pol-correctness. and they have their own thread so why not go there? the norwegian/danish guy who made that thread is a lot more trustworthy than some guy who alt-right whines for a living.
no you fools need to make ut your mind about what exactly you want. one day you are screaming the EU is too powerfull the next you are pretending the actions of a couple of countries ( without EU backing or support or input) are EU directives.
If you support Free speech, please first learn what Free speech actually is: LoL Free speech 1. What it is? The limitation on the government or government entities that pervents them from censoring information or people's communication. If you believe that the government should have this barrier/responsiblity, first you have to understand that defending free speech is defending right of people to express any view, including those you dislike (see video). It starts with you, because the government mission is to serve the society. 2. The only exception to free speech are direct threats of violence (ex. "I'm going to kill you tomorrow"), so actually you can't joke about everything. I think is important to mention this exception because leaving it out is one of the main reasons people from both sides feels tingly, and some could argue rightfully so."Offenses" that are not direct threats are free speech and have no place in government. 3. Private companies (like Poxnora) can engage in the censorship all they want, and sometimes IS NECESSARY because insults and spam can make it impossible to have a good environment for conversation anyways. Just ask @Sokolov's mods . But remember that shutting someone up because you disagree with it is censorship, and censorship is for losers.
and racism or calls for others ( like religious followers of your cult) to violence. or yelling fire in a crowded theather or anything that causes a panic like that which can potentially result in harm to bystanders. I think you need to rethink the word only.
Lol what? No. Under the law you can be racist, white supremcist, gender supremacist, etc (whatever you call it). They are all thoughts. Otherwise it is an attack on free speech. If it's an "act" of racism, that would be called discrimination and it has special clauses. But we got it, you're against free speech. Yelling randomly has to do more with public disturbance than speech, because it has to do more with time, place, and manner of your actions.
Yeah I get it you like asterisks and pretend it;s something different. same bullshit different topic. as long as you can pretend I am different from you while you spout the same ( and many times worse) things. you're a good* person. * sarcasm, you're not actually a good person.
I've heard a lot of disgust about this from the leftwing as well as the right. David Baddeil (leftwing, jewish) has been on the news saying it is ****ed up. In this case, it's hard to disagree.
Hmmm....the left wing are the people doing it, the more moderate lefts would be the ones condemning it