but due to being able to switch bgs that also means the opposite where players can claim that the others bgs is supported by the maps design creating an unfair advantage (like playing a deck with a lot of ranged flyers on the 2 font sl map) i think the map should be picked after the bg to prevent that problem.
I went through the last 30 pages of your match history, this dates back to April 6th. In the last 2 months you've played ballballer three times. 1 win, 2 losses. You lie.
I have stated to both of the players involved in this what the conditions are for the temp banning to happen. Now it is up to both parties to follow through with this if they agree to the conditions.
E.g. sign the dotted line and send him a message saying that you agree to the terms and conditions understanding that he may accidentally delete your account instead.
@mw24 You can't pick and choose which games count. If you play a ranked game and lose, it is a loss, regardless of testing a BG or not. If you insist on games only counting when using certain BGs, then test BGs with your MW24 account, and play ranked with MarkXXIV. That way we can all see which games you thought should count before the game began, not after.
I don't need to do that, the best players understand my point and the principle of what I am talking about. You don't judge skill when both players aren't using top notch bg. I don't care if others don't understand, so long as my opponent being mentioned does.
So then all of our games wouldnt count then, because i was constantly trying to figure out how to make the best Sp bg i could and changing my deck. Even at this point, i still dont have those elemental dudes to run