High res shots of the ships: http://imgur.com/a/MgvR2 Also, you can check out some of the ships in 3D here: http://www.spacewars.com/ship-viewer
The entire concept including name, gameplay, world, art direction, and unit design are stunningly generic and boring. Like, the sci fi equivalent of embarrassing sh|t like this: Spoiler that said, obv. a good game came out of pox and pox had some great ideas alongside the gay tolkein sh|t, so i backed star wars anyways. but id' rather see the designers go back to the drawing board and get some vision/inspiration/art and do something more creative.
120 Bucks for a harb and stuff. What a horrible idea that I might just throw my hard-earned money out of the window for. Gah
yeah, they could have done way better, it is a war amongst the stars afterall. they should have called it star wars.
but the stars arent warring. its the ships. so it should have been called spaceship wars. now that I think about it starcraft is a misnomer as well since youre not crafting stars and most of the battles occur on planets. planetcraft would have been more accurate.
the purpose of language is to communicate. from your tone I think its safe to say that you fully understand the meaning of my post.
But is there any real anymosity between the spaceships themselves? Other than the hive ships I doubt they are sentient. The civil war wasn't referred to as the musket war for example. Has there ever been a conflict referred to by the weapons used? ( in the specific sense and not just the general sense such as nuclear war). I guess there was the clone wars but in that case the clones were both weapon and combatant. However, to refer to a clone simply as a weapon denies their humanity and as such should probably be avoided. So... rather than 'fighting between spaceships' it would be more accurate to say 'fighting between those who fly space ships', assuming you want to drop 'wars' which in itself doesn't seem to be a problem. So might I suggest ' Those who fly spaceships Wars' or the TWFS Wars.
whoa there! clearly you are discounting the possibility of the ships having advanced AI that is capable of animosity and self control? clearly you are biased in favor of biological constructs you hive scum. I recommend you read some Neal Asher books set in the Polity universe: (https://www.goodreads.com/series/49128-polity-universe-chronological-order
as a rule I refuse to pay for kickstarters throwing cash at something and hoping it's at least good enough to F2P so your bucks weren't absolutely wasted is a deep dive. And that's already assuming you like it and whatnot it's like pre-ordering only this is a completely new thing and not like civ6 or something, even more unreliable factors as others mentioned, the game doesn't look very special, when I checked it out ages ago it looked very okayish at best
I concede to your logic. what an interesting twist it would be for the onboard computers to initiate aggression with the respective crews unable to stop it. the more I think about it the more I want to see that movie. but what would opposing A.I.'s argue over?
ragic has none of the indicators that would suggest english is not his native language. he has some indicators suggesting that troll might be his second, but that one's tougher to tell.
What's Sarcasm and how is it different from sarcasm? Also, LPT: When everything you say sounds like sarcasm, it becomes hard to tell one from the other.
I capitalized it to represent a language since that was the topic. as in I was speaking in Sarcasm. not I was speaking sarcastically. is this your selective humorlessness showing itself again or do I really confuse you that much? others here clearly get it so I know it isn't just me. perhaps its the fact that English really isn't the first language for a lot of you but you write it so flawlessly that I forget this. and so when I play with words my meaning is misunderstood when I don't expect it to be? nah youre just all liberal stiffs.
My favorite part of all this is how OTHER PEOPLE are humorless because they don't think YOU are funny. Maybe the problem is you.