2016 Primaries, Caucuses & Conventions

I'll take Voldemort over Umbridge.

 

I'd like to vote for Bellatrix

If we're all about the female hype, I'd like the one that is openly cray cray

 

It is not about having a central bank, it about have a PRIVATE central bank. For example, Syria has a central bank, but it is state owned. Syria has no IMF debt and still controls its own money. Syria's central bank is not connected to the infamous international banking cartels. Russia's bank also not privatized. USA's FED is private. England/france/Germany private (these are connected to banking cartels) One has to distinguish between private/public central banks. A central bank is ok as long as it is not privatized.

Western countries underestimate Iran. Iran has become a military power and most likely already has nukes. It can wipe out Israel with a rocket barrage if it wants to

 

I haven't voted for a presidential candidate since I turned 18. After reading enough history it's easy enough to figure out they are all owned by special interest bankers who control the federal reserve. It isn't about left/right, republican/democrat for me. It's about what candidate actually cares about America. At least Bush tried to boost the economy a little. Obama has blatantly decreased the worth of American wealth and the dollar drastically and he has also spiked our national debt to levels unheard of. He is more concerned about political correctness, creating a third world welfare state in USA and funding other countries than worrying about America. Hillary's agendas are a carbon copy of the present Obama administration. Her present actions are destructive to the American economy and I have no intention of supporting a third term Obama administration. Destroying the coal industry in Virginia are the actions of a lunatic bent on bankrupting the American economy. You kids keep listening to Cenk Uhgar and Huffpost kay. Pay no attention to policies being past behind closed doors or Barry Soetero's background.

 

Reading this is just factionally incorrect right wing bullshit





"we are the financial responsible party"

okay

Sure it's increased, but perhaps that has something to do with the... wars and financial crisis that raged under Bush's rule? Percentage wise, Obama didn't even increase it as much as Bush did, let Alone Reagan.

The deficit has gone down from 1,4 TRILLION to 486 billion




Sok could probably have done this better, but eh. Show me your facts, not your talking points. Yeah Obama hates America yada yada, Bush plunged you Firkers in a recession and wars that created ISIS, but we ain't blaming him. Must be Obama. Gotta be.

Where those facts at, right wing nutjobs?

 

there is a way to be objective about this and avoid the whole right/left yadiyada.
What does USA need? Nationalism
Why? it is op. it unites people + is the most effective thing against private central banks. (we forget this is USA biggest problem?)
What is the point in trying to solve the little problems if we dodge the biggest one.
It is like elephant in the room, people see it and still do nothing
Nationalism also gives people an identity.
Lincoln used it to win the Waaarrgh
JFK was ballin with it for a while.. a very short while but still
Andrew Jackson used it to dodge a bullet and beat the assailant with a stick (because if it wasn't for nationalism, the crowed wouldn't have restrained the assassin)
Look at how well nationalism is working in Russia.
Russia also has a national religion supporting it
Which banker is going to successfully infiltrate that?

What is the main problem in USA? FED/corporations/Zionists
How can we solve it? Promote nationalism/weaken FED/empower the people

so Vote for the candidate that promotes nationalism. preferably One who is anti-old money influence. (like Rockefeller - most likely the wealthiest man in murika because you know his daddy and monopoly)

Clinton has no sense of nationalism whatsoever. so, no (nothing personal)
trump. I don't like him, but he some nationalism in him and makes a few good points.
Feels like choosing the lesser of 2 evils, but thinking about this objectively, if one has to choose, one would choose
trump because trump has more sense of nationalism.
so that or don't vote at all.

 

All that junk has little to do with the Bush recession. Why don't you print me a stat sheet on the interest rate the FED (federal reserve bank) raised from 1998-2000. The FED hiked interest rate occurred before Bush was in office in anticipation of inflation. The inflation never happened instead the interest rate hike caused the collapse of many dot com businesses on the stock market from (1998-2000) which eventually led to a recession in 2000. Bill Clinton wasn't going to announce that he was handing G.W. Bush a recession as he went into office. For starters go look up the DOT com bust and the FED increasing interest rates. Next you want to look into the Sub prime mortgage meltdown in 2007. Why did this happen? The FED(federal reserve bank) once again hiked interest rates from 2004-2006 in anticipation of inflation. Many people taking out house loans from 2004-2006 didn't know this was happening because the CRA(community reinvestment act of 1977) forced banks to lower credit standards so people with crappy credit values could take out loans even though they didn't qualify. THANK YOU JIMMY CARTER! Bill Clinton also (INCREASED) the effectiveness of the CRA act during his administration. Reagan, Bush sr., and Bush jr. didn't expand on CRA act but didn't seek to eliminate or control it either. 2007 recession strikes again.... many ppl lose houses thanks to CRA and FED interest rate hikes. WTF does George W. Bush have to do with the FED increasing interest rates and the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act? Nothin really. JFK should of broke ties every idiot in the FED during his administration before they killed him. Fvck bankers. We need our own bank not these idiots in the FED that are bleeding us dry.

 

I am "an dope"? Amazing.


Anyhow, I see how you're upset about a lot of things. I'm waiting for you to stop dodging the original point and show me how Reagan, Bush and Bush jr were liberal, America hating muslim politically correct vegans who tried to destroy the country by gathering more debt than Obama.

 

Bush didn't start the war in Libya or Syria. Obama did. And he got a nice Nobel peace prize for it too.

That's a good point, I haven't considered that. As we can see now Syria is in war, at this very moment. Putin temporarily saved them, but I don't think the US and their coalition are giving up. And like I said before, I fear Iran is next in line.

 

As I have mentioned before, Obama is bombing/drone striking what, 7 countries now? He's not my pick for a Nobel Prize.

However justified those strikes may or may not be, they aren't a ground offensive war for changing (but ever wrong) reasons as we go along in Irak and see that there's pretty much nothing but some bad dictator going on, while we spend lives/money and peace to create an unstable middle east that fostered ISIS.

 

I don't understand. I was addressing your comment about Bush jr. being responsible for the recession.

 

Russia does the heavy lifting and then USA conveniently shows up to "help". USA was supporting ISIS/NUSRA before and now changed its mind? pfft. It is worse than window dressing. Better if USA didn't play a role from the start, maybe then ISIS wouldn't have become such a behemoth. USA forces are headed to the city of Raqqa, most likely because they want to capture it before Russia/Syria does so they can use it as a bargaining chip for future negotiations. US forces probably wouldn't have arrived if there was no Raqqa opportunity. They want that leverage. Iran, Hezbollah, and SSNP have also joined the fight against ISIS. The Lebanese military helps out but doesn't stray too far from its borders.

Iran can handle itself. If Iran is attacked, what's to stop it from raining hell on Israel. Furthermore, Iran's ally, Hezbollah is fortified in South Lebanon. If you look at the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah war, Israel lost a butlload of money daily just by being under siege (katyusha rockets). - this is one of the main reasons why Israel halted its advance. The infrastructure and trade practically shut down. Another thing is that Hezbollah and Iran don't bluff. Iranian citizens are extremely passionate when it comes to defense. Iran also has S-300. Not extactly the S-500 but it is pretty solid anti-air defense. Iran is relatively much more developed than it used to be. When was the last time USA fought someone with a decent military? And they won't start with Iran if Syria is still standing. Things are actually looking better for Syria now.

 

You are right. But Russia is already being targeted for it. The economic war and sanctions. The media smear campaign. It's pretty obvious USA wants war with Russia at this point. Also from http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-project-for-a-new-american-century/5530276:

''Part of the European concerns are a rise in nationalist sentiment in eastern Europe and the United Kingdom, for which the paper blames Russia, even bizarrely claiming that Russian funding is the cause of the disunity within the European Union—a claim without foundation, especially in the UK’s case.''

That's right. The mighty USA is concerned because some countries like Poland and Hungary do not want to take in third worlders who would mooch off of welfare. Why should that be of any concern to Hillary Clinton?

Also I can already tell you what will happen at BREXIT. People will vote to stay in and the result will be close like 51% vs 49%.

 

More videos about California being rigged:

 

Clinton been frauding all this time.

Like when she had Bill create massive lines in a voting place where a lot of Bernie supporters were supposed to show up.

Bane Shift like that all year long. But media and dem party dont care cause CLINTON DYNASTY though

 

I'm currently trying to decide which way to vote on this.

It's like trying to decide if want to die by firing squad or the electric chair. Both options seem equally awful.