+3 nora for a rank of regen, how worth is it really? Personally I find it really hard to take anything but regen 1 on only the the best tanks that I know will be able to tank long enough to make use of it. (being res skeezick, some tanky ass draksar) The fact that regen 1 is 6! nora cheaper than regen 3 is pretty sick. Insert long rant about SL and being tight on nora due to 60+ nora powerspells and poor nora gen. What's you guys opinion on this? For example I'm looking at draksar shifter (holy gods bananas), you take multi 1 for sure but what rank of regen? Regen 1 puts it at 73, regen 3 at 79. None of his 3 forms are tanky enough to warrant the +6 nora investment imo.
I'm taking rank 1 on everything if I have the choice. Might as well not be there in most cases. wtb a 60 nora Divine Favor 3 Heal 3 champ
I actually had him at regen 2 and violent for 73. I think vindrax is the only thing I run regen 3 on. Most champs I stick to regen 1. In a few instances were regen 1 would end them at a nora cost ending in 0 or 1 I bump to regen 2.
They should do away with mass regen upgrades and go back to balancing champs' regen ranks individually (SOE did this for a reason, and it was one I agreed with - regen ranks clogging up upgrade slots is boring). This would free up an upgrade slot for something less boring (some champs could still have a regen path, maybe).
I may sound naive or ignorant.... but are you joking or not? I honestly don't know because I've been taking regen 3 on some and 1 on others..... Noobletop :/
I used to think just like you, but then I took my champions out of fonts way before they got hurt, losing the font bonus in the process. On that note, oh how I wish the regen also healed in the turn you received it from the font. That has never stopped bugging me, and never will :\ .
