Have you performed a t-test in order to prove that it is a statistically significant difference? Because if not than you know nothing John Snow.
No. I worked out a while back how close both me and tiny were away from 81% and he was much closer. He must have lost a hell of a lot of games (my bad tiny).
I was going to but I'm pretty sure it isn't. If anything, tinydragon has kept that winrate for twice the amount of games...
Ummm 10,375 win for tiny 5,760 wins for devils Yeah your not even close bub better luck in like 4 years.
I find it funny how you edited out kthx. I'm currently ranked 52nd, but with less than 1000 ranked games, that does not really mean anything. *edited for grammar
Don't forget that my win-rate is historical. It was very hard to have a win-rate like that when I played seriously - but it also doesn't reflect how well I play now. I'm very rusty and certainly not the strongest player around! Tiny and Devils both have incredibly impressive stats. Maintaining 80%+ over that many games/years is no small feat.
the real winrate that matters is your winrate against skilled opponents when both players are playing seriously and using top notch competitive decks.(that are pretty evenly matched) For good players most games are just filler/irrelevant farming matches.(i spend most of my games testing different themes) And some players are opportunist and farm scrubs alot more than others or only play a tough opponent when they're using a weak deck. kthx may have like a 83% winrate or watever but he's no where near the skill level of tinydragon. games with huge rating difference should only be non ranked matches(or only ranked for the lower ranked player) and you should be able to see your winrate against the top rankings but that data isnt currently available.
