Named Champions

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Molosse, Jan 28, 2015.

  1. Molosse

    Molosse I need me some PIE!

    It's damn strange to see two named champions on the board at once, why did this happen again?
     
  2. Cydna

    Cydna Forum Royalty

    Someone was watching my game.

    Edit: Since Hero gives a cost reduction, the the reskins (Aria, Pyro, etc) lost hero.

    Unique was removed and they never changed the rune limit.
     
  3. Molosse

    Molosse I need me some PIE!

    Fair enough, wouldn't mind them dropping back into x1 territory.
     
    Morfeas likes this.
  4. bagoftrick

    bagoftrick I need me some PIE!

    I think its safe to say that almost everyone would be happy if unique was added back to these champions.
     
    Tarathil likes this.
  5. BurnPyro

    BurnPyro Forum Royalty

    They never had unique.
     
  6. Atherhog

    Atherhog I need me some PIE!

    Question: Is there a benefit to having 2x of the same champ?
    Question: If yes, should unique have a negative nora value?
    Question: What would that mean for G'hern?
     
  7. Strings

    Strings Devotee of the Blood Owl

    De facto they did through hero.
     
  8. Pedeguerra

    Pedeguerra I need me some PIE!

     
  9. Morfeas

    Morfeas I need me some PIE!

    Every named rune should at least be 1x if not have hero. Hero should be revisited to accommodate this.
     
    Tarathil likes this.
  10. Pedeguerra

    Pedeguerra I need me some PIE!

    Those things should only be able to be ran as x1 in a bg.
    Having played against and watched Yobanchi drop 2 Corraghs in a match is the most obnoxious thing ever.
     
    Tarathil likes this.
  11. Gust Gord

    Gust Gord Member

    I completely Firking agree
     
  12. soulmilk

    soulmilk I need me some PIE!

    I accidentally made the same thread as this just a few minutes ago without noticing this one.

    Unique became Rune Limit 1.
    Mythical (If you control 2 of this unit, both dies) was removed from the game without anything compensating for it.

    I personally would want to see "Mythical" runes get changed to Rune Limit 1.
     
    Morfeas likes this.
  13. Atherhog

    Atherhog I need me some PIE!

    I personally think all named runes should be mythical but why only 1 in a BG?

    Couldn't you make the argument that if they are too good to be 2x then they are OP and should be toned down?
     
  14. Morfeas

    Morfeas I need me some PIE!

    I don't think it's about OPness or strength, it's more about "There's only one Grimlic. That's it. You lose him, he's gone. You gotta wait for him to regain his strength (CD) to join your forces again."
    It doesn't make much sense for a unique, named rune to die only to be redeployed next turn ;/
     
    soulmilk and Gust Gord like this.
  15. Atherhog

    Atherhog I need me some PIE!

    True enough...

    So this is a 'lore' based decision. I can buy into that.
     
  16. Gust Gord

    Gust Gord Member

    You have learned a lot from my logic threads
     
  17. Morfeas

    Morfeas I need me some PIE!

    I like to think of lore as logic. :)
     
    soulmilk likes this.
  18. Gust Gord

    Gust Gord Member

    Don't I'm actually planning on remaking the lore
     
  19. kalasle

    kalasle Forum Royalty

    Grunewald, you're a funny guy.
     
    KingJad likes this.
  20. Pedeguerra

    Pedeguerra I need me some PIE!

    Agreed 100%.
     

Share This Page