plz plz plz fix Stitched Librarian take of Nora Hex from him ............... this chmp kill poxnora or make him like Negation Mage in ( SL ) i run away from pox for long time cuz librarian you cant play or use Strategy ... or any Tactics.... he is in ( DMZ ) and far back there neer the avatar and make you win ;/ plz plz plz do something thank you
So, deploy Librarian = autowin. ("This champion kills Poxnora", "You can't play or use strategy... or any tactics..." ) New forums, same epic posts :S
It's about 2x2 guys, it's serious. But to the OP, I wanna point something to you: in the negation mage, counterspell mastery is in upgrades, so if nora hex were so powerful, people wouldn't upgrade that ability.
Well tbh it would be nice if DoG would finally implement 2v2 specific rune bans. I really dislike that SoE seemed to have a policy for ignoring this subject completely.
I asked this very specific question in the FAQ thread.. It still hasn't been answered yet so I guess they aren't ready to talk about 2v2 yet.
2v2 interactions are… well, most likely not intended interactions from the beginning and given how runes work and how the battle groups work, it would've taken a few extra steps to prevent the battle group from being in 2v2 if there were just some specific runes. The only three settings that I see on a rune is <forsale></forsale> <tradeable></tradeable> <allow_ranked></allow_ranked> So nothing innately 2v2 specific, if they banned a rune they would have to ban a rune I believe. If they just made a ban list, it wouldn't really be easily enforceable. Also, while the 2v2 mechanic is rather interesting, I still feel as though it really hasn't been fleshed out.
It may be possible to modify the restrictions based on the lobby. When they ban a rune from rank I believe its still available for play in TG and when the Highlander tournament was on that lobby had a restriction for 1 copy of a rune only. So perhaps the answer is a 2v2 lobby and maybe they could make it so that your 2v2 rank only comes up in the 2v2 lobby. This would appease the group of people that claim ranks doesn't matter while at the same time complain that someone's name is higher than theirs because of a 2v2 rank
Sorry, I thought your post was downplaying 2v2 as a viable game option. Tbh they can just add new tags for 2v2. They can do anything they like really. I mean they limit runes to 2 per deck and they remove runes from ranked. I can't see much issue in adding a new flag to remove runes from 2v2 or limit runes to 3 between two battlegroups when trying to queue.
As long as they dont change runes interaction in 1v1 to make a change for 2v2 players i do not care what happens. I do not play 2v2 at all.
