CIA says Russia influenced US election to help Trump win

I am confused right now.

 

hes saying don't give up hope, there may be a nuclear war yet.

 

In a third WW scenario, what place do you guys think will be the safest?

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex...s-if-World-War-3-breaks-out/amp?client=safari

My guess was New Zealand, and that did make the above top ten list.

 

do you really want to survive a nuclear war? I mean, I don't even like camping.

 

Some chill South American country. I have my eyes on Uruguay.

 

More news, sort of, regarding this topic:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/02/politics/digital-fingerprints-russia-hacking/

Essentially Woolsey is saying it seems likely/certain that Russians hacked, but that it's not as simple as that, as there are probably many others that may have penetrated the system. It didn't seem like any part of the article discussed whom Woolsey thought put out the Podesta and DNC emails. Which seems like a valid question if he believes it likely that multiple entities penetrated those systems, I'm not sure if it's the assumption of CNN and/or Woolsey that being responsible for penetrating the system would automatically make Russia responsible for the dissemination of information as well.

When Woolsey was asked about Trump's comments and whether or not Trump was essentially messing with the media/public, Woolsey described it as a dialogue, and acknowledged that Trump is good at talking his way around things.

Earlier, Trump had indicated that he knows more about the hacks than the public, and would release more information soon.

McCain has largely increased his rhetoric, not quite calling for war directly... but then kicking out diplomats and applying sanctions have historically been seen as acts of war... and McCain feels that Obama's actions in this regard didn't go far enough. He plans to hold hearings in Congress once they are back in session.

 

Fricken McCain dude..comes off as a warmonger on almost everything lol as far as obamas actions i think its a mismatch. I almost always think you retaliate in kind. If they hit you underhanded without saying a word, you do the same to them. Obamas method seemed more to hobble Trump a little rather than actually do anything.

 

Interview of Assange, worth a watch if you can spare 40 min.:

 

beautifull, like watching a train crash in slow motion from a distance.

I hope from a far enough distance, but at least I am not in that train.

 

Shocking, this is the first time I have received information pointing towards Trump being a massive hypocrite.

 

Shocking, this is the first time that I have received information pointing towards *choose one/both

• Trump being an incredibly self-absorbed and selfish man.
• Trump displaying all the standard signs of a Fascist.

 

what about it strikes you as Fascist?

 

What about Trump doesn't strike you as a Fascist?

 

I thought we were speaking only about this particular instance?